Air Flotation System Treatment Efficiency
1. Removal Rates for Key Pollutants
Pollutant | Removal Efficiency |
---|---|
Suspended Solids (SS) | 85–95% removal efficiency |
Oils & Greases (O&G) | 90–98% removal efficiency |
Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD) | 50–70% reduction |
Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) | 40–60% reduction |
2. Factors Affecting Efficiency
- Bubble Size & Distribution: Microbubbles (30–100 μm) improve contaminant adhesion.
- Chemical Coagulants/Flocculants: Adding polymers (e.g., alum, ferric chloride) can boost efficiency by 10–20%.
- Hydraulic Retention Time (HRT): Longer retention (15–30 minutes) enhances separation.
- Wastewater Composition: Higher influent contaminant concentrations may reduce efficiency.
3. Comparison with Other Technologies
Air flotation typically outperforms sedimentation in removing light particles and oils.
When combined with dissolved air flotation (DAF), efficiency reaches >95% for emulsified oils.
4. Industry-Specific Performance
Food & Beverage
90%+ SS and FOG removal
Petrochemical
85–95% oil separation
Pulp & Paper
70–80% COD reduction
For optimal efficiency: Regular maintenance (e.g., skimmer adjustment, nozzle cleaning) and proper chemical dosing are critical. Advanced systems with automated controls can further stabilize performance.